Earlier, I rejected this. I talked to Jack Jansen (who apparently is
the originator of this idea :-) and maybe it can be resurrected, if we
define that instead of X.0 we write X[0] and for X.mib-2 we write
X.mib_2 (a simple translation or fallback could be used here). The X
object doesn't need to contact the server (I think Jack can better
fill in the details since I still know next to nothing about SNMP...).
--Guido van Rossum, CWI, Amsterdam <Guido.van.Rossum@cwi.nl>
<URL:http://www.cwi.nl/cwi/people/Guido.van.Rossum.html>