Re: Why don't stringobjects have methods?

Tim Peters (tim@ksr.com)
Fri, 01 Apr 94 15:10:26 EST

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Sjoerd Mullender: "Re: Why don't stringobjects have methods?"
Previous message: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Why don't stringobjects have methods?"
Next in thread: Jim Roskind: "Tossing return values from functions (without -k option or printing)"

> ... Hence for an *arbitrary* function,
>
> f(x) and None
>
> won't always go printless :-(.

[f(x)] and None

will.

briefly y'rs - tim

Tim Peters tim@ksr.com
not speaking for Kendall Square Research Corp

Next message: Sjoerd Mullender: "Re: Why don't stringobjects have methods?"
Previous message: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: Why don't stringobjects have methods?"
Next in thread: Jim Roskind: "Tossing return values from functions (without -k option or printing)"